Equipment Services Case Studies About Insights Start a Conversation
Based in Singapore · Available for new projects

Your independent eye
inside China's automation
supply chain.

Technical advisory for global manufacturers sourcing dispensing, assembly, testing and packaging equipment from China. I identify the risks your supplier won't tell you — before you sign.

10+
Years of experience
25+
Projects delivered
$50M+
Managed project value
4
Countries served
01Dispensing
02Assembly
03Testing
04Packaging

Equipment expertise

Four equipment types.
One point of accountability.

I focus exclusively on the equipment categories where I have hands-on commissioning experience — so you get a real technical opinion, not a checklist.

01 / Dispensing Equipment

Precision dispensing:
where most line failures begin

Dispensing systems — adhesive, solder paste, conformal coating, fluid dispensing — are among the most specification-sensitive equipment in any production line. Chinese suppliers often optimise demos for controlled conditions, not your actual production environment.

I evaluate dispensing systems against your actual fluid properties, substrate tolerances, and cycle time requirements — not the supplier's standard spec sheet.

Common risks I surface for clients
Valve and needle specs quoted at ideal conditions, not production range
Pump repeatability not validated across full operating temperature
Vision alignment inadequate for your substrate variation
No calibration protocol defined for production handover
Spare parts lead times and maintenance access undisclosed
How I help
Pre-purchase technical audit
On-site evaluation of the supplier's dispensing platform against your actual process requirements before you commit budget.
1–3week turnaround
FAT protocol design & supervision
I write the acceptance criteria and attend the factory test — ensuring the dispensing system passes real conditions, not a staged demonstration.
100%of my FATs surface hidden issues
Ramp-up & process optimisation
On-site support during installation. I tune parameters, train your operators, and document the final process window.
02 / Assembly Equipment

Automated assembly:
complexity hidden in simplicity

Assembly automation — pick-and-place, screw driving, press-fit, robotic cells — appears straightforward until you're at FAT and cycle time is 30% below spec or reject rate is 5× the promised figure.

I have commissioned over 15 assembly lines across 3C electronics and tobacco manufacturing. I know exactly which corners Chinese machine builders cut when no one is watching.

Common risks I surface for clients
Robot payload and reach specs quoted without collision-path validation
End-of-arm tooling not designed for your component tolerance variation
Cycle time quoted as theoretical, never validated at full cadence
Vision calibration drifts after 4–6 hours of thermal soak
No documented changeover procedure for product variants
How I help
Vendor capability assessment
I audit the supplier's existing machines, interview their engineers, and review reference builds — verifying they can actually build what they're quoting.
72hrstypical on-site audit duration
Specification gap analysis
I compare the supplier's technical proposal against your actual requirements — identifying every ambiguity before the contract is signed.
23average gaps found per project
Full project management
From PO issuance through final SAT sign-off. Weekly supplier progress calls, milestone tracking, immediate escalation when the build deviates.
03 / Testing Equipment

Functional testing:
the last line of defence

End-of-line functional testers, AOI systems, electrical test stations — if these pass defective products, you find out from your customer. I ensure your test equipment is validated against actual defect modes, not just supplier-defined test cases.

With experience in 3C electrical testing and tobacco product quality verification, I understand both the test engineering and the manufacturing context.

Common risks I surface for clients
Test coverage gaps — real defect modes not in the supplier's test plan
False-positive rates unquantified and masking real failures
Software validation documentation absent or incomplete
Test fixtures not designed for the full product variant range
Data export format incompatible with your MES or quality system
How I help
Test plan review & gap analysis
I map the supplier's test coverage against your known defect modes — ensuring the tester will actually catch real-world issues.
FAT with golden samples
I bring your actual products — including intentionally defective samples — to the FAT. If the tester doesn't catch them, I won't sign off.
0uncaught defects at my FATs
Data integration & validation
I verify test data flows correctly into your quality systems and that traceability records meet your audit requirements.
04 / Packaging Equipment

Packaging lines:
where schedule risk is highest

Packaging automation — primary, secondary, end-of-line — involves the most complex mechanical systems and the highest risk of schedule overrun. Chinese packaging machine builders often over-promise on speed and under-deliver on reliability.

Having delivered 10+ packaging line projects for Fortune 500 tobacco and FMCG clients, I know which suppliers deliver and which ones will still be debugging on your production start date.

Common risks I surface for clients
OEE guarantees defined using uptime only — efficiency and quality rate excluded
Changeover times quoted without consumable cost or tooling complexity
Mechanical wear components not in the maintenance schedule
Format parts not included in the base price — discovered post-PO
No spare parts plan for remote installation locations
How I help
Supplier shortlist & due diligence
I identify and evaluate 3–5 qualified Chinese packaging machine builders for your specific application — saving 3–6 months of internal evaluation time.
3–6mosaved on vendor selection
Contract & specification review
I review the technical annex before your legal team signs — identifying every ambiguity that could become a dispute after delivery.
Installation & SAT management
On-site supervision of installation and site acceptance testing. I manage the punch list and drive ramp-up to target OEE.
95%+OEE achieved at Week 1

Advisory services

Four engagement models

Structured to match where you are in the procurement process — from vendor selection through ongoing operations support.

01 / 04

Vendor Due Diligence

On-site assessment of shortlisted Chinese equipment suppliers. I evaluate technical capability, quality systems, financial stability, and reference installations — then deliver a written report you can act on.

¥15,000 – ¥30,000 / project
02 / 04

Technical Specification Review

Equipment specifications written by Chinese suppliers are designed to win orders, not bind performance. I translate, audit, and rewrite the technical annex so you know exactly what you are — and aren't — buying.

¥15,000 – ¥30,000 / project
03 / 04

FAT / SAT & Ramp-up Support

I attend Factory Acceptance Testing at the supplier's facility and Site Acceptance Testing at your plant. I write the protocol, manage the punch list, and stay through ramp-up until you hit target OEE.

¥15,000 – ¥40,000 / engagement
04 / 04

Ongoing Technical Advisory

Retained access to a senior automation engineer with deep China supplier knowledge. Supplier escalations, specification reviews, project oversight, process improvement — on demand, as needed.

¥150,000 – ¥400,000 / year

How it works

From first call to full production

A structured engagement process — so there are no surprises on either side.

01
Assess

We align on objectives, constraints, and timeline. I review your vendor shortlist and existing documentation.

  • 30-minute discovery call
  • Review existing specs and proposals
  • Define scope and deliverables
  • Fixed-fee proposal within 48hrs
02
Evaluate

On-site in China, I verify what suppliers claim — technical audits, factory visits, specification gap analysis.

  • On-site supplier audit
  • Technical capability testing
  • Risk identification and scoring
  • Written report with clear recommendations
03
Deploy

FAT at the supplier, SAT at your facility, installation supervision, and ramp-up management.

  • FAT protocol design and execution
  • Punch list management
  • Installation supervision
  • Operator training support
04
Support

Ongoing advisory access — available for supplier escalations, new projects, and process improvement.

  • Monthly retainer or per-project
  • Supplier performance management
  • Continuous process improvement
  • New equipment project support

Case studies

Real projects.
Real results.

All clients anonymised per confidentiality agreements. Results are actual project outcomes.

Tobacco · HNB
40%
faster commissioning
Assembly + Testing

Reduced commissioning time by 40% for a Fortune 500 tobacco manufacturer

A global tobacco company launching a new HNB line in Southeast Asia. The Chinese supplier had never exported. I joined as technical lead from spec review through SAT, identifying 23 critical gaps pre-contract and restructuring the FAT protocol — delivering a line that hit 95% OEE in week one.

HNB Assembly FAT / SAT Southeast Asia Testing Integration
3C Electronics
$2M+
risk avoided
Dispensing + Assembly

Prevented a $2M+ procurement mistake for a global consumer electronics client

Client had signed an LOI with a Chinese dispensing-assembly vendor. My audit uncovered fabricated reference visits and inadequate precision capability. Contract cancelled at zero penalty. Client re-sourced through my network and launched on schedule.

Vendor Due Diligence Dispensing Equipment Risk Management China Audit
Food & FMCG
6mo
to full production
Packaging

Delivered a secondary packaging line from zero to 97% OEE in 6 months

A multinational food company setting up a co-packing facility in Vietnam with a fully Chinese-sourced packaging line. I managed spec writing, vendor selection, FAT in Guangzhou, installation supervision, and ramp-up — 3 weeks ahead of the original project schedule.

Secondary Packaging Full PM Vietnam OEE Achievement

About

A specialist,
not a generalist

I spent a decade inside global manufacturing — designing automation equipment, commissioning dispensing and assembly lines, and leading cross-border projects for Fortune 500 companies in tobacco and 3C electronics.

Most international manufacturers buying Chinese automation don't have a technical expert in the room. They rely on supplier documentation that is incomplete, poorly translated, or written to obscure limitations. That's where projects fail.

I founded this practice to give global manufacturers a genuine technical advocate during China procurement. No sales agenda. No supplier relationships to protect. Just clear, independent technical advice.

Get in touch →
Experience
10 years in industrial automation
Specialisation
3C · Tobacco · FMCG
Languages
English · Mandarin
Based in
Singapore · Travel worldwide

Replace with your photo

What clients say

Trusted by engineering
and procurement teams

"

Having someone in the room who actually knew what questions to ask the supplier changed everything. We caught issues during FAT that would have cost us 3 months and significant budget to fix post-installation.

VP
VP Engineering
Fortune 500 Tobacco Manufacturer · Southeast Asia
"

The due diligence report was the clearest technical document I've received from any consultant. It gave our team the confidence to walk away from a supplier that looked good on paper but couldn't deliver.

PM
Head of Manufacturing Projects
Global Consumer Electronics Company

Insights

Straight talk on China
automation procurement

View all articles
Article image
Vendor Due Diligence

5 things Chinese equipment suppliers won't tell you before you sign

Most international buyers discover equipment limitations at FAT — when changing suppliers is no longer an option. Here's what to ask before you commit.

Article image
Dispensing Equipment

How to specify a dispensing system that actually works in production

Dispensing specs written by suppliers are optimised for demos, not your process. A practical guide to writing specs that bind supplier performance.

Article image
FAT / SAT

Why your Factory Acceptance Test is failing — and how to redesign the protocol

A FAT that doesn't replicate real production conditions is a performance, not a test. Here's how to design one that actually surfaces problems before shipment.

Get in touch

Tell me about
your project

I respond to every serious enquiry within one business day. No sales pitch — just a direct conversation about whether I can help.

Currently accepting new projects — Q3 2026 onwards

Your information is kept strictly confidential.

✓ Message received. I'll respond within one business day.